solar

Renewable energy services for agribusinesses and value addition

Photo via Envato Elements

Renewable energy services for agribusinesses and value addition

Sector
Most major industry classification systems use sources of revenue as their basis for classifying companies into specific sectors, subsectors and industries. In order to group like companies based on their sustainability-related risks and opportunities, SASB created the Sustainable Industry Classification System® (SICS®) and the classification of sectors, subsectors and industries in the SDG Investor Platform is based on SICS.
Renewable Resources and Alternative Energy
Sub Sector
Most major industry classification systems use sources of revenue as their basis for classifying companies into specific sectors, subsectors and industries. In order to group like companies based on their sustainability-related risks and opportunities, SASB created the Sustainable Industry Classification System® (SICS®) and the classification of sectors, subsectors and industries in the SDG Investor Platform is based on SICS.
Alternative Energy
Indicative Return
Describes the rate of growth an investment is expected to generate within the IOA. The indicative return is identified for the IOA by establishing its Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Return of Investment (ROI) or Gross Profit Margin (GPM).
> 25% (in ROI)
Investment Timeframe
Describes the time period in which the IOA will pay-back the invested resources. The estimate is based on asset expected lifetime as the IOA will start generating accumulated positive cash-flows.
Short Term (0–5 years)
Market Size
Describes the value of potential addressable market of the IOA. The market size is identified for the IOA by establishing the value in USD, identifying the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) or providing a numeric unit critical to the IOA.
< USD 50 million
Average Ticket Size (USD)
Describes the USD amount for a typical investment required in the IOA.
< USD 500,000
Direct Impact
Describes the primary SDG(s) the IOA addresses.
Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7) Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8) Climate Action (SDG 13)
Indirect Impact
Describes the secondary SDG(s) the IOA addresses.
No Poverty (SDG 1) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (SDG 9)
Typology Categorisation
Categorization of the borderland based on its stability and level of regional integration infrastructure.

Type 3: Borderland with fragile context and underdeveloped regional integration infrastructure.

Business Model Description

Deploy solar-powered equipment for agro-processing and livestock processing activities such as milling, cooling, drying, and powering abattoirs through lease-to-own or pay-as-you-go models. Target cooperatives, processing hubs, abattoirs, and trader groups in off-grid and weak-grid areas. Partner with energy service companies and agri-focused financiers. Blend private investment with results-based financing and grants to reduce upfront costs and de-risk adoption.

How is this information gathered?

Cross-border investment opportunities with potential to contribute to sustainable development are based on Borderlands SDG Investor Maps.

Disclaimer

UNDP, the Private Finance for the SDGs, and their affiliates (collectively “UNDP”) do not seek or solicit investment for programmes, projects, or opportunities described on this site (collectively “Programmes”) or any other Programmes, and nothing on this page should constitute a solicitation for investment. The actors listed on this site are not partners of UNDP, and their inclusion should not be construed as an endorsement or recommendation by UNDP for any relationship or investment.

The descriptions on this page are provided for informational purposes only. Only companies and enterprises that appear under the case study tab have been validated and vetted through UNDP programmes such as the Growth Stage Impact Ventures (GSIV), Business Call to Action (BCtA), or through other UN agencies. Even then, under no circumstances should their appearance on this website be construed as an endorsement for any relationship or investment. UNDP assumes no liability for investment losses directly or indirectly resulting from recommendations made, implied, or inferred by its research. Likewise, UNDP assumes no claim to investment gains directly or indirectly resulting from trading profits, investment management, or advisory fees obtained by following investment recommendations made, implied, or inferred by its research.

Investment involves risk, and all investments should be made with the supervision of a professional investment manager or advisor. The materials on the website are not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any investment, security, or commodity, nor shall any security be offered or sold to any person, in any jurisdiction in which such offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.

Read More

Region

Explore the cross-border region of the investment opportunity.

Sector Classification

Situate the investment opportunity within sustainability focused sector, subsector and industry classifications.
Sector

Renewable Resources and Alternative Energy

Sub Sector

Alternative Energy

Borderland development need
Frequent outages and limited grid connectivity impede productive use of electricity for enterprises. In West Pokot, cooperatives report power cuts up to six times a week, increasing reliance on diesel generators and raising costs by as much as 300 USD monthly. These challenges restrict milk processing, cold storage, irrigation, and small manufacturing. Despite high solar potential, uptake remains low due to high upfront costs, limited infrastructure, and weak financing mechanisms. The inability to power rural businesses sustainably constrains job creation and local value addition. (18, 21)

Borderland policy priority
Karamoja’s KIDP3 promotes solar stations, mini solar water systems, and repairs to existing solar installations. It also supports biogas for cooking and lighting. West Pokot’s CIDP highlights solar tech innovation, clean jiko distribution, and technology transfer for sustainable off-grid energy. Both plans support awareness campaigns and training to accelerate adoption of solar and biogas solutions across public and private use cases. (1, 2)

Gender inequalities and marginalization issues
Women-led enterprises and agro-pastoral households struggle to adopt solar and biogas systems due to high upfront costs and limited financial tools tailored to their needs. Women's role in managing household energy is high, yet they remain underrepresented in energy project planning and technical training. Expanding access requires inclusive design and gender-sensitive financing mechanisms. (11, 12, 17)

Investment opportunities introduction
High solar irradiation creates favorable conditions for off-grid solar powering cold storage, irrigation, and dairy processing. Biogas has strong potential in agro-pastoral areas where animal waste is readily available. Investment in productive energy use can unlock SME growth, improve food preservation, and reduce fuelwood dependency. (11, 12)

Adoption of solar for productive use and biogas is limited by lack of affordable credit, insufficient technical capacity, and low awareness among end users. Most SMEs lack working capital for energy investments, and few service providers operate in remote borderland areas. Maintenance and after-sales services are also limited. (11, 12)

Industry

Solar Technology and Project Developers

Pipeline Opportunity

Discover the investment opportunity and its corresponding business model.
Investment Opportunity Area

Renewable energy services for agribusinesses and value addition

Business Model

Deploy solar-powered equipment for agro-processing and livestock processing activities such as milling, cooling, drying, and powering abattoirs through lease-to-own or pay-as-you-go models. Target cooperatives, processing hubs, abattoirs, and trader groups in off-grid and weak-grid areas. Partner with energy service companies and agri-focused financiers. Blend private investment with results-based financing and grants to reduce upfront costs and de-risk adoption.

Case Studies

Business Case

Learn about the investment opportunity’s business metrics and market risks.

Market Size and Environment

Market Size (USD)
Describes the value in USD of a potential addressable market of the IOA.

< USD 50 million

Over 100 cooperatives and agri-processors across Karamoja and West Pokot lack reliable energy, relying on costly diesel. Their unmet energy needs for cooling, milling, and drying define a clear, scalable market for solar-powered productive-use systems across the borderland. (26)

Indicative Return

ROI
Describes an expected return from the IOA investment over its lifetime.

> 25%

Solar-powered agri-use systems reduce diesel OPEX by up to 70% and enable year-round production. When deployed via pay-as-you-go or leasing, and anchored to cooperatives, they generate 20–35% ROI within 2–4 years, supported by industry benchmarks and ongoing initiatives. (26)

Investment Timeframe

Timeframe
Describes the time period in which the IOA will pay-back the invested resources. The estimate is based on asset expected lifetime as the IOA will start generating accumulated positive cash-flows.

Short Term (0–5 years)

Productive-use solar investments reach breakeven within 2–4 years. Year 1 covers site selection and setup, year 2 sees revenue generation, and years 3–4 bring ROI recovery. This mirrors rollout cycles in similar rural energy projects targeting agri-businesses. (26)

Ticket Size

Average Ticket Size (USD)
Describes the USD amount for a typical investment required in the IOA.

< USD 500,000

Market Risks and Scale Obstacles

Capital - CapEx Intensive

Solar-powered processing systems require high upfront investment ($50K–$500K), which many cooperatives cannot afford. Without blended finance or results-based grants, adoption remains slow despite long-term savings. (20)

Capital - Limited Investor Interest

Investor appetite remains low due to perceived risks of rural infrastructure, informal clients, and uncertain returns. Few financiers offer tailored instruments for energy-agriculture cross-sector ventures in borderland areas. (21)

Business - Supply Chain Constraints

Access to quality solar components, storage systems, and skilled technicians is limited in remote areas. Delays in installation, maintenance, and spare parts disrupt operations and reduce reliability for agro-enterprises. (22)

Expected Financing Model

Expected Financing Model
Describes the time period in which the IOA will pay-back the invested resources. The estimate is based on asset expected lifetime as the IOA will start generating accumulated positive cash-flows.

Blended financing (risk sharing and public support)

IOA Business Criteria

IOA Business Criteria
Describes the time period in which the IOA will pay-back the invested resources. The estimate is based on asset expected lifetime as the IOA will start generating accumulated positive cash-flows.

Demand from over 100 cooperatives and processors across the borderland shows strong market potential, with diesel replacement offering quick savings and productivity gains. (26)

Targets solar-powered equipment for agro-processing (cooling, milling, drying) through PAYGO or lease models, focusing on cooperatives and rural processors. (26)

Can scale through anchor clients and bundling with energy service providers; aligns with regional trends in solar for productive use in agri-value chains. (13, 14, 15)

Models used by SolarGen or Zeronet in similar East African rural contexts show viability of solar for agro-enterprises using blended finance. (20, 22)

Impact Case

Read about impact metrics and social and environmental risks of the investment opportunity.

Sustainable Development Need

Most agri-processors in the borderland rely on costly and unreliable diesel generators, limiting productivity and increasing operational costs for cooperatives and trader groups. (13, 14, 20, 22)

Lack of access to affordable, clean energy hinders post-harvest handling and value addition, contributing to high food losses and limited income generation. (13, 14, 20, 22)

Karamoja and West Pokot are mostly weak-grid and off-grid areas. Less than 1% of households are grid-connected in parts of Karamoja, and no viable power alternatives exist for rural enterprises. (13, 14, 20, 22)

Gender & Marginalisation

Women-led cooperatives often lack reliable power for small-scale processing, limiting income diversification and access to markets. (20, 21)

High upfront costs of solar-powered equipment exclude marginalized groups (especially youth and women) from adopting productive-use technologies. (21, 22)

Energy poverty disproportionately affects women, who spend long hours collecting fuel and working in poorly lit, low-productivity environments. (14, 21)

Expected Development Outcome

Solar-powered systems enable agro-processors and cooperatives to expand operations, reduce losses, and increase earnings through consistent and cost-effective energy access. (13, 14, 15)

Renewable energy for processing stimulates value addition and off-farm employment, particularly in youth- and women-led enterprises. (13, 14, 15)

Gender & Marginalisation

Solar-powered processing reduces labor burden and enables women-led cooperatives to expand income-generating activities such as dairy, milling, and poultry. (20, 22)

Pay-as-you-go models and cooperative-based distribution lower barriers to energy access for pastoralists and underserved rural households. (20, 22)

The deployment of renewable energy systems creates opportunities for youth in installation, maintenance, and entrepreneurship, supporting local employment and skills development. (20, 22)

Primary SDGs addressed

Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7)
7 - Affordable and Clean Energy

7.1.1 Proportion of population with access to electricity

7.2.1 Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption

Decent Work and Economic Growth (SDG 8)
8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth

8.2.1 Annual growth rate of real GDP per employed person

Climate Action (SDG 13)
13 - Climate Action

13.2.2 Total greenhouse gas emissions per year

Secondary SDGs addressed

No Poverty (SDG 1)
1 - No Poverty
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (SDG 9)
9 - Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

Directly impacted stakeholders

People

Farmers, processors, and cooperative members will benefit from reliable, affordable energy to reduce post-harvest losses and increase value addition.

Gender inequality and/or marginalization

Women-led cooperatives and youth enterprises gain access to energy solutions that expand productivity and reduce manual labor.

Planet

Agro-enterprises reduce diesel reliance, lowering emissions and promoting cleaner production methods.

Corporates

Energy service providers gain new rural markets through anchor clients and long-term lease models.

Public sector

County and district governments benefit from improved productivity, tax revenue, and alignment with energy access targets.

Indirectly impacted stakeholders

People

Local consumers benefit from more affordable, higher-quality processed goods.

Gender inequality and/or marginalization

Local consumers benefit from more affordable, higher-quality processed goods.

Planet

Regional ecosystems benefit from reduced deforestation and land degradation associated with biomass and generator use.

Corporates

Financiers and agri-tech firms find opportunities in bundling credit, inputs, and services with energy delivery.

Public sector

National energy and agricultural agencies gain momentum toward climate resilience and rural development goals.

Outcome Risks

Without targeted efforts, women and low-income groups may lack access to solar leasing due to financing barriers, deepening existing inequalities.

Installation of solar systems on communal land could trigger disputes if community consultation and benefit-sharing are not ensured.

Improper disposal of solar equipment (e.g., batteries) can lead to environmental hazards, especially in regions lacking recycling infrastructure.

Introduction of external energy companies may displace or crowd out local informal energy providers if partnerships are not inclusive.

Impact Risks

High upfront costs and weak financing mechanisms may limit adoption by cooperatives and traders, delaying access to clean energy and limiting productivity and income growth.

If women and marginalized groups lack targeted support, they may be excluded from leasing and training opportunities, reinforcing existing inequalities in energy access and business growth.

Improper disposal of solar equipment or lack of local capacity for maintenance may lead to environmental harm and reduce long-term sustainability of renewable energy systems.

IMP Impact Classification


What

Expands energy access for agri-processing, boosting productivity, reducing carbon emissions, and enhancing rural livelihoods.

Who

Directly impacts cooperatives, processors, and trader groups in off-grid areas; indirectly benefits rural communities and smallholder farmers.

Risk

Limited financing, supply chain gaps, and lack of technical capacity may delay adoption and reduce impact.

Enabling Environment

Explore policy, regulatory and financial factors relevant for the investment opportunity.

General Policy Environment

Karamoja Integrated Development Plan 3 (KIDP3): Prioritizes agro-industrialization and climate-smart agriculture, including promotion of solar-powered processing, irrigation, and storage to improve food security and resilience in off-grid areas. (1)

West Pokot County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP): Emphasizes renewable energy access for agro-processing, promotion of off-grid solar solutions, and development of energy-efficient technologies for rural economic growth. (2)

Uganda Energy Policy (2023): Advocates for expanding renewable energy to unserved communities, including solar mini-grids and solar-powered agricultural equipment, to drive inclusive rural industrialization. (27)

Kenya Energy Act (2019): Provides a legal framework to promote renewable energy investments, supporting off-grid and pay-as-you-go solar solutions for productive use in rural agribusiness and industry. (28)

Uganda Renewable Energy Policy (2007): Uganda Renewable Energy Policy (2007)Targets increasing the use of modern renewable energy from 4% to 61% of total consumption by prioritizing decentralized solar energy for productive use, especially in agriculture. (29)

General Cross-border Trade Policy and Regulatory environment

EAC Customs Union Protocol (2005): Facilitates free movement of goods within the East African Community, including duty-free treatment for eligible renewable energy equipment crossing borders like solar panels and agro-processing units. (35)

EAC Common External Tariff (CET): Classifies renewable energy equipment under low or zero-duty categories, reducing import costs for solar technologies used in agro-processing and cooling across Kenya and Uganda. (36)

EAC Non-Tariff Barriers (NTB) Act (2017): Aims to eliminate NTBs that slow cross-border trade in goods like solar-powered machinery; supports smoother movement of equipment for off-grid agro-processing solutions. (37)

IGAD Protocol on Transhumance (2021, not yet ratified): Though focused on pastoral mobility, it promotes harmonized resource access, including infrastructure and energy services, across borders—relevant for powering shared livestock processing hubs. (38)

African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Agreement: While broader in scope, it facilitates regional value chains, including renewable energy technologies and agro-processing services, reducing regulatory and tariff barriers across member states. (39)

Capital structure and funding

Sources of Capital: Existing capital in the region comes from a mix of national government funds, international donor grants, and concessional loans. Programs like the EU-funded NDMA and USAID Kuza support agro-processing and rural electrification through subsidies and technical assistance. (21)

Average Capital Size: Average capital sizes for existing projects vary: community-scale solar agro-processing hubs require $50,000–$200,000, while larger cold chains or mini-grid facilities may reach $500,000–$1 million. Smaller initiatives are often grant-financed, while mid-sized ventures blend public and private funds. (21)

Trends of Capital Flows: Capital flow trends show a rise in blended finance, with development partners prioritizing resilience and productive-use energy. West Pokot and Karamoja have received targeted support for solar-based agro-processing, cold storage, and cooperative-led agribusinesses in recent years. (21)

Impact of Conflict on Capital Flows: Local conflicts have historically deterred private capital, but recent cross-border peace agreements and disarmament initiatives have boosted investor confidence. Stable zones now attract more support for infrastructure and energy access. (21)

Development Partner Support: Governments and development partners provide investment support via loan guarantees, infrastructure co-financing, and technical assistance. Support is strongest in agriculture, energy, and cooperatives, aligning with the focus on off-grid renewable-powered value chains. (21)

Financial incentives

Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa (SEFA): Managed by the African Development Bank, SEFA provides catalytic finance to unlock private sector investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency. It offers technical assistance and concessional finance instruments to remove market barriers and improve the risk-return profile of individual investments. (40)

Kenya's Draft National Green Fiscal Incentives Policy Framework: This policy proposes tax exemptions and credits for off-grid renewable energy installations, aiming to expand energy access in underserved areas. It also suggests concessional funding for pre-investment geothermal resource assessments to de-risk investments. (41)

Uganda Energy Credit Capitalisation Company (UECCC): UECCC offers concessional loans and partial risk guarantees to financial institutions, encouraging lending for renewable energy projects. This support has led to the creation of dedicated energy loan products, such as Centenary Bank's "Cente Solar" and Equity Bank Uganda's "Green Loan." (42)

Import Duty Exemptions in Uganda: Uganda exempts import duties on specialized solar energy equipment, including solar panels, inverters, and batteries. This policy reduces the cost of renewable energy technologies, facilitating their adoption in agro-processing. (43)

Security Environment

While large-scale raids have declined, sporadic attacks persist, disrupting livestock markets and deterring investment in processing and solar infrastructure reliant on stable trade flows. (44, 45, 21)

Traders transporting solar-powered equipment or agri-products may face bribes or theft at informal checkpoints. This raises costs and limits scalability of decentralized PAYGO models. (18, 44, 45)

The lack of permanent security presence and continued reliance on informal justice mechanisms create impunity for asset theft, threatening investment in distributed solar systems. (44, 45, 46)

Seasonal conflicts, particularly involving Turkana and Pokot communities, can disrupt livestock trade and agro-processing hubs that depend on regional inputs, especially near water infrastructure used for solar-powered cooling. (44, 45, 48)

Persistent conflict risks limit bank willingness to lend to cooperatives or SMEs in the sector. High collateral demands and fear of loan default tied to mobility restrictions affect working capital and leasing options. (20, 21, 22)

Risk mitigation strategies

Leveraging local institutions helps build trust, facilitates inclusive outreach, and reduces exposure to elite capture or conflict over benefits.

Use SACCOs and local saving groups to deliver solar and processing tech with adapted repayment models and shared ownership, boosting local buy-in.

Integrate women in training, ownership models, and leadership of cooperatives to enhance equity, social stability, and long-term sustainability.

Deploy portable solar and agro-processing solutions to avoid overconcentration of assets in conflict-prone areas and maintain flexibility.

Invest in strengthening cross-border peace committees and livestock route mediation efforts to reduce disruption risks to trade and infrastructure.

Actors in IOA Space

References

See what sources were used to establish the investment opportunity’s data and find resources that could be consulted to explore more.

Sector and Subsector Sources

  • IOA Sources

    • (18) Interview with Foundation supporting access to finance for entrepreneurs in West Pokot
    • (19) Interviews with main commercial banks in Moroto
    • (20) Interviews with private renewable energy actor in West Pokot
    • (21) Interview with Climate Impact Investing Fund with operations in West Pokot
    • (22) Interview with Energy Solutions company with operations in Kenya and Uganda
    • (26) Estimations based on interview data with renewable energy actors in the IOA space and benchmark regional studies.
    • (27) Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (Uganda). The Energy Policy for Uganda 2023. Kampala: Government of Uganda, 2023.
    • (28) Republic of Kenya. The Energy Act, 2019. Nairobi: National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General.
    • (29) Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (Uganda). Renewable Energy Policy for Uganda. Kampala: Government of Uganda, 2007.
    • (30) Republic of Uganda. Electricity Act, 1999. Kampala: Uganda Gazette Supplement No. 3, Act 6.
    • (31) Republic of Kenya. Energy (Mini-Grid) Regulations, 2021. Nairobi: Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (EPRA).
    • (32) Electricity Regulatory Authority (Uganda). Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariff (REFiT) Guidelines, 2016. Kampala: ERA.
    • (33) Republic of Kenya. Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2020. Nairobi: National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General.
    • (34) Republic of Uganda. Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 1998. Kampala: Uganda Gazette Legal Notice No. 13, under the National Environment Act Cap 153.
    • (35) East African Community (EAC). Protocol on the Establishment of the East African Community Customs Union. Arusha: EAC Secretariat, 2005.
    • (36) East African Community (EAC). Common External Tariff (CET). Arusha: EAC Secretariat, current edition as amended.
    • (37) East African Community (EAC). Non-Tariff Barriers (Elimination) Act, 2017. Arusha: EAC Secretariat.
    • (38) Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD). Protocol on Transhumance in the IGAD Region. Djibouti: IGAD, 2021.
    • (39) African Union Commission. Agreement Establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). Kigali: African Union, 2018.
    • (40) African Development Bank (AfDB). Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa (SEFA). Available at: https://www.afdb.org/en/topics-and-sectors/initiatives-partnerships/sustainable-energy-fund-for-africa
    • (41) Ernst & Young (EY). Kenya publishes Draft National Green Fiscal Incentives Policy Framework. Available at: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/technical/tax-alerts/kenya-publishes-draft-national-green-fiscal-incentives-policy-fr
    • (42) World Resources Institute Africa. Unlocking Local Private Capital to Finance Productive Use Renewable Energy (PURE) Sector. Available at: https://africa.wri.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/unlocking-local-private-capital-finance-productive-use-renewable-energy-pure-sector.pdf
    • (43) Sun-Connect East Africa / GIZ. Solar Taxation Handbook 2022. Available at: https://sun-connect.org/wp-content/uploads/SolarTaxationHandbook2022.pdf
    • (44) Gray, S., Sundal, M., Wiebusch, B., Little, M. A., Leslie, P. W., & Pike, I. L. (2003). “Cattle Raiding, Cultural Survival, and Adaptability of East African Pastoralists”. Current Anthropology, 44(S5), S3–S30. Retrieved from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/377669
    • (45) Stites, E. (2022). Conflict in Karamoja: A Synthesis of Historical and Current Perspectives, 1920–2022. Karamoja Resilience Support Unit (KRSU), Feinstein International Center, Tufts University.
    • (46) USAID. (2023). Applied Political Economy Analysis for the Karamoja Cluster. Washington, DC: USAID.
    • (47) Interview with cross-border trade associations.
    • (48) US Agency for International Aid (2019). Off-Grid Solar Market Assessment - Kenya. Power Africa Off-grid Project.
    • (49) National Planning Authority. National Development Plan III (NDPIII) 2020/21 – 2024/25
    • (50) Mokveld, K. and von Eije (RVO.nl), S. (2019). Final Energy report Uganda. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2019/02/Final-Energy-report-Uganda.pdf